Difference between revisions of "User:Mathistruth/Sandbox"

From BowlingChat Wiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with 'At times it is suggested to drill finger holes deeper to maintain static weight limitations when using certain balance holes. A study was conducted to determine the effects on m…')
 
 
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
At times it is suggested to drill finger holes deeper to maintain static weight limitations when using certain balance holes.  A study was conducted to determine the effects on mass properties when drilling finger holes 2" deep compared to 3.5" deep.  I used CAD software to model a double thumb drilling and study the effects of drilling finger holes deeper.  The ball used in the study was a MoRich Frenzy at 15 pounds.  The dual angle layout used is 65x4"x30 based on a PAP measurement of 5" over by 3/8" up.
+
== Effects of drilling finger holes deeper ==
  
[[:Image:Frenzy_Dbl_Thm_Analysis.pdf‎ |Frenzy Finger Hole Depth Study]]
 
  
 +
There are times when it is suggested to drill finger holes deeper to maintain static weight limitations when using certain balance holes.  A study was proposed to determine the effects on mass properties when drilling finger holes 2" deep compared to 3.5" deep.  Using CAD software, I modeled the double thumb layout of 65x4"x30, based on a PAP measurement of 5" over by 3/8", on a MoRich Frenzy at 15 pounds.  The following table shows the mass properties for the un-drilled Frenzy, drilled with no balance hole and drilled with a 1.25" x 3" deep balance hole in the double thumb position. Notice the total differential of the ball does decrease slightly when drilling the fingers deeper but maintains the intermediate differential so the diff ratio actually increases slightly.
  
RG-2.533" Total Differential-0.047" Intermediate Differential-0.019"
+
Steve Freshour
  
65 x 4" x 30 fingers 2" deep and weight hole in double thumb position 1 1/4" x 3" deep
 
  
RG-2.535" Total Differential-0.061" Intermediate Differential- 0.032"
 
  
65 x 4" x 30 fingers 3.5" deep and weight hold in double thumb position 3/4" x 3" deep
+
[[File:Frenzy_65x4x30_DT_Finger_Depth_Study.jpg‎]]
 
 
RG-2.549" Total Differential-0.057" Intermediate Differential-0.031"
 
 
 
2" deep fingers Low RG 2.533 Total Diff .047 Int Diff .019
 
3.5" deep fingers Low RG 2.547 Total Diff .043 Int Diff .019
 

Latest revision as of 22:26, 29 October 2010

Effects of drilling finger holes deeper

There are times when it is suggested to drill finger holes deeper to maintain static weight limitations when using certain balance holes. A study was proposed to determine the effects on mass properties when drilling finger holes 2" deep compared to 3.5" deep. Using CAD software, I modeled the double thumb layout of 65x4"x30, based on a PAP measurement of 5" over by 3/8", on a MoRich Frenzy at 15 pounds. The following table shows the mass properties for the un-drilled Frenzy, drilled with no balance hole and drilled with a 1.25" x 3" deep balance hole in the double thumb position. Notice the total differential of the ball does decrease slightly when drilling the fingers deeper but maintains the intermediate differential so the diff ratio actually increases slightly.

Steve Freshour


Frenzy 65x4x30 DT Finger Depth Study.jpg